A World Affected by Pollution and Global Warming Essay Example for Free

A World Affected by Pollution and Global Warming Essay Roy M. Harrison.(2001) Pollution:Cause, Effects and Control. Royal society of chemistry. This author concentrates mainly chemical and radioactive pollution. The book speaks of the sources of pollutants and their effects on both living and non livings especially human. It also shows how chemical pollution can also cause of water, air and land pollution. Agarwal S.K. Water pollution. APH publishing(Jan.1 2005) The author bases the book on recent views, ideas and contribution of various leading ecologist information of water pollution. It show how to use waste water and its treatments. Irina Gray (2008). Pollution effects on humans, animals, plants and the environment. The writer shows the various types and causes of pollution and its effects on the environment. It shows the effect on human ranging mild discomfort to serious diseases. It also how the effect destroy animal life and the atmosphere. Credit: www.Tropical-Rainforest-Animals.com Margaret A. Wheatley(1996). Social and cultural impact of mercury pollution on Aboriginal people in Canada. Neurotox 17(1), 251-256 The writer explores the link between mercury pollution and social cultural disruption in Canadian aboriginal communities. It shows the difficulties in communication that contribute to the social and cultural impacts and their health effects.Credit: V. Ramanathan and G. Carmichael(2008). Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon.Nature Geoscience 221-221. The writers express how black carbon becomes air pollution and how it affects both the climate and the environment. This book said that the pollution affect different regions and the black carbon in soot is the dominant absorber of visible solar radiation in the atmosphere. Credit: www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n4/full/ngeo/56.html S.Fred Singer.(1968) Global Effects of environmental pollution. Science 13 vol. 162 no 3859. The author talks the pollution effects on humans, animals, plants and the environment. It expresses the cause of pollution and how it causes the extinction of animals and plants species which is a grave loss for mankind. It shows how the advancement in technology aids the improvement of a well being of mankind but also its consequences. Credit: books.google.com/books Clive Glifford (2006). Planet under pressure:pollution. Rain-tree ISBN-13: 9781844439 744. The book examines how pollution has become a global issue and looks at the debate over possible solution. It shows how pollution whether air, water, radioactive or terrestrial affect the lives of a lot of people causing disease and contributing to the global warming. Credit: www.booksdirect.com.au/books/?isbn=9781844439744 Green StudentU. Pollution. This is a encyclopedia entry which speaks of how toxic chemicals from factories pollute the land, air and water. It explains what pollution is and why there are different types . Of the types, It takes of their sources and how to prevent them. It gives link to environment protection agency website if to be involved in prevention of pollution. It also gives the statistics of the people affected by pollution and other. Credit: www.greenstudentu.com/encyclopedia/pollution

Hamlet: Emotions of Despair, Sadness, Anger, and Inner Peace :: Shakespeare Hamlet Essays

Hamlet: Emotions of Despair, Sadness, Anger, and Inner Peace The character of Prince Hamlet, in Shakespeare's "Hamlet," displays many strong yet justified emotions. For instance, in Hamlet's "To be Or Not To Be" soliloquy, perhaps one of the most well known quotes in the English language, Hamlet actually debates suicide. His despair, sorrow, anger and inner peace are all justifiable emotions for this troubled character. Hamlet's feeling of despair towards his life and to the world develops as the play moves on. In Hamlet's first soliloquy he reveals that his despair has driven him to thoughts of suicide; "How weary (horrible) †¦ His law 'gainst self slaughter." Likewise, when Hamlet talks to his friends, Rosenerantz and Guildenstern in Act 2 scene 2, Hamlet wishes they tell the King and Queen that he has "lost all mirth," in this world so "foul and pestilent." In his "To be or not to be" soliloquy, he expresses his despair through thoughts of suicide, suggesting that suicide is an easy way to end life's conflicts. But luckily he concludes that the fear of an unknown afterlife is what keeps us living. All of Hamlet's thoughts of despair can be understood when one looks at the horrible conflicts Hamlet goes through. Sorrow, perhaps the most evident emotion, is very well developed throughout the play. Initially, the only cause of Hamlet's sorrow is his father's death. However, after reading Act 1, scene 2, we see in Hamlet's asides that another source of his melancholy is his mother's hasty marriage to Claudius, the new king of Denmark. Further, when Queen Gertrude asks her son why his father's death "seems" so important, he replies, "Seems, madam? Nay it is. I know not 'seems'." In addition, Shakespeare reveals another source of sadness; now Hamlet is alone, with the most loved character in his life, Ophelia, rejecting him. This cause is well brought out in Hamlet's soliloquy in which he states; "Now I am alone. O, what a rouge and peasant slave am I!" Finally, when Hamlet discovers that Ophelia has died, new reasons for Hamlet's extreme feelings of sorrow are added. In fact, his sorrow is so great that "Forty thousand brothers/Could not (with all their quantity of love) Make up my sum." Thus, Hamlet's well developed sadness, is reasonable throughout the play. Unfortunately, Hamlet's thoughts of mourning are replaced by those of anger. Most readers of Hamlet agree, to some extent or another, that Hamlet is well justified in expressing anger. Perhaps the first incident of Hamlet's true expression of anger is during his scene with the ghost in Act

Benthams version of Utilitarianism Essay

Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that shows the reasons for a person choosing to carry out an action – it justifies an action being for the greater good. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which means it looks at the consequences or result of an action – to decide whether it is subsequently right or wrong this also makes it a consequentialist theory. The theory of Utilitarianism began with Jeremy Bentham. Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism is where actions are judged based upon the pleasure gained in the result. Jeremy Bentham was the man who originally thought of and came up with the idea of Utilitarianism, he believed in ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’. There are two types of Utilitarianism; Bentham’s theory is Act Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is about creating the greatest amount of pleasure in a particular situation through a particular action. Bentham believed and used research to conclude that people would naturally seek pleasure and avoid pain. ‘Nature had placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do as well as to determine what we shall do.’ (Bentham) Bentham truly believed that pleasure was the purest form of good and pain the sole evil; he saw this as moral fact. This is why Bentham is also known as a hedonist. The hedonists were a group of Greek people who sought to find true pleasure; ‘hedone’ means pleasure in Greek, this group included people such as Plato and Aristotle – who agreed that good was found in the greatest happiness. The principle of utility was a way to find out how good or bad an action was, based on its utility (usefulness). An action that creates the most pleasure and the least pain is a useful one and therefore it is good – pain v pleasure. For Bentham good, is the maximum amount of pleasure with the minimum amount of pain afflicted and bad, is pain with little pleasure received. Bentham believed that in any situation a person should think of a solution that will lead to the maximum happiness for the maximum of people. For example, if a man with the cure for cancer and a young child were in a car crash, you would assume to save the life of the child as they are considered to be innocent, however with Bentham’s theory you should do the maximum amount of good for the maximum amount of people, which means you should save the man. By saving the one man you then save thousands, the action of letting the child die is out weighed by the amount of people you have saved if using Bentham’s theory. However Bentham knew that it would be hard to predict the outcome of every situation and know which route to take and so in order to help, he came up with the ‘hedonic calculus’ which you can use to work out which option will produce the greatest amount of pleasure. There are seven factors which you must take into account when choosing what to do in a certain situation; the intensity of the pleasure, the duration of the pleasure, how certain pleasure will be the result, how near the pleasure is to you, how continuous is the pleasure, is there likely to be pain mixed with the pleasure and how widespread will the pleasure be. When faced in a dilemma, Bentham believed that you could chose the ‘good’ option – the option which would do the most amount of good and the least amount of pain. For example, if you are in a plane crash and you could only save one person; your wife, your child or a doctor who has the ability to save many. Bentham believes in this situation you must use ‘the hedonic calculus’ to form a solution to your problem. The doctor could make thousands of lives better and create much more pleasure than if you save the wife or child, however this tough decision would leave you without pleasure. Following Bentham’s utilitarianism you must save the doctor. When a decision has to be made over a moral situation, the hedonic calculus is used. In using the hedonic calculus the individuals involved should be considered by applying the seven factors to them in relation to the options for the choice of action you have. ‘Utilitarianism has no serious weakness’ Discuss It is true that Utilitarianism does have many strengths however it does have weaknesses too. Bentham, Mill, Hare and Singer’s theories each have their own faults. Utilitarianism is very straight forward and easy to understand. It is very natural for a person to consider the outcome and how much pleasure they will gain before going through with an action. It is a principle that aims to bring people happiness this is very appealing for many in societies. Many of the ideas and theories can be related to specific actions and situations and therefore can be helped out in the process of considering what to do in certain places, for example; giving to charity gives happiness to the poor and is good whereas acting cruelly towards someone is bad. The use of Utilitarianism can be carried out universally. Utilitarianism is not dependant on any religion, culture, race or society as it is about a person or groups happiness. This use of utilitarianism is great because it makes people picture and understand other people’s point of view for example; if you were to hit someone then instead of carrying out the action, you would think about the outcome – picture yourself in the other person’s shoes – understand that pain which you would cause and subsequently stop yourself from hurting them. You have to think of other people’s pleasure and pain rather than just your own. This is mainly used in preference utilitarianism as Hare put it ‘standing in someone else’s shoes’. The fact that Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory is both good and bad. It is natural for us to weigh up the consequences of an action before carrying it out however it is never going to be easy to always predict the outcome of an action completely right for example; if you go out to steal to help your family survive but then get caught and arrested then you can no longer carry out the ‘good’ action of helping your family. Utilitarianism may also be argued against because it ignores or seems to ignore the importance of following duties – the act itself may be right or wrong for a reason other than the amount of happiness it produces, for example an old friend is on his death bed and asks you to swear that you will give à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½30,000 (all of his money when he dies) to his favourite park he used to visit but on the way to handing over the money you see an advert that says it needs à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½30,000 to save 10,000 people. Out of duty you must give the money to the park however if you are following Utilitarianism your belief is that the money must going into creating the most good/ happiness which would be saving those 10,000 people. W.D Ross believed it was important for you to follow and carry out your duty. Bentham’s Act utilitarianism although was flexible and relied on the consequences it had no defence for minorities for example; one slave being treated badly but creating happiness for a whole family would be thought of as right. Also it is very impractical having to calculate using the ‘hedonic calculus’ every decision we make. There is also a difficulty defining what pleasure is for example; a paedophile’s pleasure is very different to another person’s. Mill’s Rule utilitarianism is very practical and sets about certain rules for society that must be maintained which can help societies to operate. However there are weaknesses to rule utilitarianism too again there is no defence for minorities or any help at what defines happiness but also this time if you are following rules you could end up obeying them even when more happiness can be created by disobeying them.

The History of the Tea Party From Its Beginning to Now

The tea party movement may only be a few years old, but the beginning of the movement is often misunderstood and misreported. While the tea party is often portrayed as being purely an anti-Obama movement, the truth is that the Republican Party has always been as much a target as President Obama and the Democrats. The Tensions Rise During the George W. Bush Years While the tea party may have formerly started after Obama took office, anger over federal spending and a rapidly bloating government began to surface during the big-spending years of the George W. Bush administration. While Bush scored points with conservatives on his tax policies, he also fell into the trap of spending too much money that didnt exist. He pushed for a large expansion of entitlements and, most dangerously, continued the Clinton-era policies that led to the collapse of the housing market and financial industries. While conservatives opposed these big spending measures, it is also true that they lagged far behind their liberal-counterparts in vocalizing anger, showing up at Capitol Hill to protest, or rallying thousands of people at any given time to support a cause or oppose a policy. Until the rise of the tea party, the conservative idea of activism was to shut down the congressional switchboard. Yet despite one disappointment after the next from our elected leaders, voters continued to send the same people back year after year. It would take a major economic crisis to help Sarah Palin Rallies a Crowd Prior to the 2008 elections, it seemed as though conservatives had no clue how to rally a crowd around a cause. While they had their moments — opposing Bushs immigration policies and Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers to name two--a real movement was hard to come by. But in 2008, John McCain selected Sarah Palin to be his vice-presidential candidate and suddenly the Republican base did something they never really did before: they showed up. When Palin joined the Republican ticket, people suddenly started attending rallies. McCain events had to be moved to larger venues. Rather than attracting hundreds of people like McCain had been doing, Palin was attracting thousands instead. Palin was hard-hitting, despite being seemingly restrained by the establishment. She gave one of the greatest convention speeches ever, where she hit out at Barack Obama and saw her popularity soar. She connected with people. And while she was eventually destroyed and rendered ineffective during the 2008 campaign, her ability to actually get thousands of people to rally for a cause would jump-start the future tea party movement, and she would eventually become the top draw at future tea party events nationwide. Rick Santelli Delivers a Message Shortly after his inauguration in January of 2009, President Obama began pushing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a package costing close to $1 trillion. Already infuriated with the final years of the Bush administration that saw multibillion-dollar bailouts and payoffs, conservative outrage of the fiscal insanity was escalating rapidly. After the package passed, CNBC personality Rick Santelli took to the airwaves to deliver what would be the final spark to ignite the tea party flames. In what turned out to perfectly summarize tea party sentiment, Santelli took to the floor of the Chicago Stock Exchange and stated the government is promoting bad behavior... This is America! How many of you people want to pay for your neighbors mortgage that has an extra bathroom and cant pay their bills? Raise their hand.  When the floor traders started booing the government policies, Santelli dropped the President Obama, are you listening?  line. In the rant, Santelli also stated that Were thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July. All you capitalists that want to show up to Lake Michigan, Im gonna start organizing.  The clip was widespread, and the first tea party rallies were held eight days later on February 27th, 2009, where tens of thousands of protesters showed up in over 50 cities to voice opposition to the Bush and Obama spending sprees. Tea Party Targets Republicans and Democrats Challenging Democrats in November elections is always a fun thought for tea party members. But it is not their first goal. The tea party does not exist to challenge only Democrats simply to return the same Republicans who rubber-stamped the big government Bush agenda for eight years. And this is why the first victims of the tea party in any given election cycle are always Republicans. The first goal of the tea party was to target liberal Republicans up for reelection. Arlen Specter (PA), Charlie Crist (FL), Lisa Murkowski (AK), and Bob Bennett (UT) were just a few of the many politicians backed by the mainstream GOP but opposed by the tea party. Specter saw his time was up and bailed to join the Democrats. When Crist realized he was soon to lose to a young conservative star in Marco Rubio, he jumped ship and ran as an independent. Bennett was so unpopular he couldnt even earn a primary slot. Murkowski lost her primary also but was eventually saved by the Democrats after launching a write-in campaign. Only after getting a strong foothold in the Republican Party by knocking off incumbent or establishment Republicans would the tea party focus their attention on Democrats. As a result, the myth of the blue dog Democrat was mostly destroyed and the GOP decimated the ranks of so-called conservative Democrats. It would be over three years since the start of the tea party movement before conservatives would have a shot at President Obama. The number of Republicans that the tea party has brought down is proof enough that this is about more than just one man. Final Takeaway The tea party does not exist because of one individual. It exists as a result of the constant and rapid growth of government under both Republican and Democratic-led governments. The tea party does not care whether there is a D or an R next to a politicians name or whether a politician is black, white, man, or woman. If a Republican is elected president, the tea party will exist to hold him just as accountable as they hold President Obama. Anyone seeking proof can ask any of the many moderate Republicans who have been ousted in primaries for failing to follow the principles of limited government.

What Is a Quoin Explaining an Architecture Detail

Quite simply, a quoin is a corner.  The word quoin is pronounced the same as the word coin (koin or koyn), which is an old French word meaning corner or angle. Quoin has come to be known as the accentuation of a buildings corner with short side header bricks or stone blocks and long side stretcher bricks or stone blocks that may or may not differ from the wall masonry in size, color, or texture. Key Takeaways: Quoin Quoin, which means corner in French, is a feature, usually decorative, found on the corner of a structures exterior.Quoins are dressed stone or wood, more finished or worked over to catch the eye.Quoins are most common in Western architecture, particularly Georgian styles. Quoins are very noticeable on buildings — as noticeable as a jerkinhead roof. Sometimes decorative quoins stick out more than their surrounding stone or brick, and very often they are a different color. The architectural detail we call the quoin or quoins of a structure is often used as decoration, defining space by visually outlining the geometry of a building. Quoins may have possible structural intent, also, to strengthen walls in order to add height. Quoins are also known as langle dun mur or the angle of a wall. Architectural historian George Everard Kidder Smith has called them Prominently beveled stones (or wood in imitation of stone) used to give emphasis to corners. Architect John Milnes Baker defines the quoin as the dressed or finished stones at the corners of a masonry building. Sometimes faked in wooden or stucco buildings. Typical French House in Montmartin-Sur-Mer, Normandy, France. Tim Graham/Getty Images (cropped) The various definitions of quoin emphasize two points — the corner location and the largely decorative function of the quoin. Like Bakers definition, The Penguin Dictionary of Architecture describes quoins as dressed stones...usually laid so that their faces are alternately large and small. A dressed construction material, whether stone or wood, means that the piece has been worked to a particular shape or finish that is unlike but complementary to the adjoining materials. The Trust for Architectural Easements points out that corners can be found in various parts of a structure, as quoins are usually prominent and may outline windows, doorways, segments, and corners of buildings. Quoins are most often found in European or Western-derived architecture, from ancient Rome, to 17th century France and England, and 19th and 20th century buildings in the United States. Examining Uppark Mansion Sometimes it takes multiple definitions to get a true sense of architectural details. Uppark Mansion, shown here in Sussex, England, can use all of the definitions above to describe its quoins — the corners of the building are emphasized, the stones are laid alternately large and small at the corners, the stones are finished or dressed and are a different color, and the large, prominent masonry units also outline the facade protrusion, acting like columns that rise to the Classical pediment. Uppark Mansion in Sussex, England. Howard Morrow/Getty Images (cropped) Built in approximately 1690, Uppark is a good example of how architectural details combine to form what becomes known as a style, which is really just a trend. Upparks Classical elements of symmetry and proportion combine with medieval-era stringcourse — the horizontal band that seems to cut the building into upper and lower floors. The roof style invented by French architect Franà §ois Mansart (1598-1666) is modified into the hipped slate roof with dormers we see here — all characteristics of what became known as 18th century Georgian architecture. Although used in ancient, Renaissance, and French provincial architecture, decorative quoins became a common feature of the Georgian style, after the rise of the line of British kings named George. A National Trust property, Uppark House and Garden is remarkable to visit for another reason. In 1991, a fire gutted the mansion. The cause of the fire was workmen ignoring construction safety orders. Uppark is a fine example not only of quoins, but also of superior restoration and preservation of a historic manor house. Sources Baker, John Milnes. American House Styles: A Concise Guide. Norton, 1994, p. 176Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, quoin, https://www.britannica.com/technology/quoinFleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus. The Penguin Dictionary of Architecture, Third Edition.  Penguin, 1980, p. 256Smith, G. E. Kidder. Source Book of American Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, 1996, p. 646The Trust for Architectural Easements. Glossary of Architectural Terms. http://architecturaltrust.org/outreach/education/glossary-of-architectural-terms/

The Main Contributions to Charles Dickens Popularity

The Victorian period gave way to a plethora of writers and works that would later be revered as undeniable classics, many works of which we continue to read to this day. One author from this period, however, stands out in all respects of the word. His personal life, written works, and social commentary attribute to the widespread popularity that Charles Dickens managed to accumulate even after his death. He has been the subject of countless hours of research, studies, and literary critiques; regardless of one’s personal opinion, it is impossible to doubt the significance of Dickens and his entire collection of work. Mr. Dickens had an inexplicable gift which allowed him to write and convey some of the greatest stories of that time period, as well as having crafted interesting and memorable characters that have also been subject to study, even in the twenty-first century. Charles Dickens is, without a doubt, an irreplaceable man, a part of literary history who continues to asse rt his importance through the continued survival and appreciation of his works. Early Life and Beginnings as a Writer Charles John Huffam Dickens was born in Portsmouth, Portsea Island, England on 7 February 1812, son of John and Elizabeth Dickens. His father (John Dickens) worked in the Naval Pay Office as a clerk, but aspired to greater things, hoping to ultimately strike it big and become rich. His mother (Elizabeth Dickens nee Barrow) hoped to be a teacher and, later, a school director. Dicken’sShow MoreRelatedVictorian Novel9605 Words   |  39 Pagesdates frame the period of Victorian literature, it is commonly accepted that it was the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) that saw the novel emerge and flourish, all the more that the 1937 was the year when Dickens’ Oliver Twist, the first major work of fiction. The first readers of both, Dickens and Eliot were not conscious they lived in the ‘Victorian period’. They thought that this was a modern era marked with turbulent transition. However, the most crucial writers of the period grew up in the earlierRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 Pagesthe beginning of the story there is an emotional loss which makes the protagonist leave on his journey. In a Bildungsroman, the goal is maturity, and the protagonist achieves it gradually and with difficulty. The genre often features a main conflict between the main character and society. Typically, the values of society are gradually accepted by the protagonist and he/she is ultimately accepted into society — the protagonist s mistakes and disappointments are over. In some works, the protagonistRead More The Issue of Inflation Control as an Objectice of Central Banks4407 Words   |  18 Pagesintermediate and long term objectives. Gradually, a loose consensus emerged among industrially advanced countries that the dominant objective of monetary policy should be price stability, and from the outset of the 1990’s, this belief has increased in popularity. However, differences continue to exist among central banks with regard to the appropriate intermediate target. While some consider monetary aggregates and, therefore, monetary targeting as operationally meaningful, others focus exclusively on interestRead MoreNew York City: History and Landmarks4966 Words   |  20 Pagesyears, a full 12 million of the 16 million immigrants who arrived in the U.S. passed through Ellis Island on their way to a new life in the New World. Ellis Island opened to the public in 1976; visitors can tour the Immigration Museum in the restored Main Arrivals Hall and trace their ancestors through millions of immigrant arrival records made available to the public in 2001.   Federal Hall National Memorial   Federal Hall, located at 26 Wall Street, served as the birthplace of American government:Read MoreBritish Culture11529 Words   |  47 Pagesto each other. Furthermore, Parliament overtook the power of the monarchy in Britain. Anger due to the practices of the Anglican Church grew and ultimately caused: The Civil War (1642) = war between ‘Cavaliers’ and ‘Roundheads’ 1649 – King Charles I is executed ïÆ'   Britain briefly becomes a republic and is called ‘The Common Wealth’. The Glorious Revolution = From now on, a monarch could only rule with the support of parliament. The eighteenth century A relatively stable century. Read MoreMetz Film Language a Semiotics of the Cinema PDF100902 Words   |  316 Pagespublication and the printing of this volume, have become obsolete and no longer correspond to the present state of my investigations.** Thus, in the case of partial changes in my orientation, or simply of new developments, or even when recent contributions to the field by other authors had to be accounted for, I have preferred toupdate merely by adding notes (rather long ones when necessary) instead of modifying the original texts. †  * Originally published in French under the title Essais sur laRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 PagesNetherlands At last, a text that brings organization theory into the 21st century! This is the first organization theory textbook to provide full and informed coverage of a range of contemporary developments in the field. Notably, it includes diverse contributions to organization theory made by critical management studies. It really is pathbreaking in terms of its inclusion of material that does not appear in other texts. Professor Hugh Willmott, Cardiff Business School, UK This is one of the most up-to-dateRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages62 Experiential Exercise Feeling Excluded 62 Ethical Dilemma Board Quotas 62 Case Incident 1 The Flynn Effect 63 Case Incident 2 Increasing Age Diversity in the Workplace 64 3 Attitudes and Job Satisfaction 69 Attitudes 70 What Are the Main Components of Attitudes? 70 †¢ Does Behavior Always Follow from Attitudes? 71 †¢ What Are the Major Job Attitudes? 73 Job Satisfaction 78 Measuring Job Satisfaction 79 †¢ How Satisfied Are People in Their Jobs? 80 †¢ What Causes Job Satisfaction? 81 †¢Read Morepreschool Essay46149 Words   |  185 Pagesposting process; and (9)†¯participants in the public hearing process. Project Leaders The following staff members of WestEd are gratefully acknowledged for their contributions: Peter Mangione, Charlotte Tilson, and Cathy Tsao. Lead Researchers Special thanks are extended to the lead researchers for their expertise and contributions as lead writers. Visual and Performing Arts James Catterall, University of California, Los Angeles Physical Development Abbey Alkon, University of California

Philosophy Originated From The Greek Language. It Is Made Up Of Two Wo Essay Example For Students

Philosophy Originated From The Greek Language. It Is Made Up Of Two Wo Essay rds: phileinwhich means to love and sophia which means wisdom. There are three fundamentalquestions in the field of philosophy which are referred to as the Existential Concerns. What can I know?, What ought I to do?, What is the meaning of life and my place inthe universe? These complex questions are discussed in the basic areas of philosophy. Epistemology is the theory of knowledge. The major question in this area is, whatis truth? There are various theories about the correct answer. One explanation is theCorrespondence Theory of Truth. This theorem puts forth the idea that the only real truthhas tangible evidence to back it up. For example, a witness to a crime. That person wasthe only one, other then the direct people involved who know what happened. However,religion and science are two forms that go against this theorem. Another theory is nothingis truth. This consists of the idea that we cannot know anything with certainty. Thefollowers of this theorem are usually classified as being skeptical. Another explanationfor truth is considered Sense Perception. Sense Perception is subjective and relative,therefore it is not a tangible form of knowledge. There is still one more form ofdetermining the truth, mathematics or Intellectual Knowledge. For example, if I were toask you to add two and three, the only true answer you could give me would be five. Theis not a subjective or relative example. Many people consider math to be a universal truth. We will write a custom essay on Philosophy Originated From The Greek Language. It Is Made Up Of Two Wo specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now There are various questions associated with the area of ethics. Each of them dealwith morals. Morals are defined as the right conduct or duties of a man. The firstquestion is, are there any universal moral values? Moral relativists will either deny or be infavor of the existent of universal values. One instance where I can explain this idea, iswith the Nuremberg trials of 1946. Post World War II, several top officials of the Naziregiment were put on trial for the crimes they committed against humanities. However,they didnt plead guilty. Their defense was that they were simply following orders and thelaws presented by the state. Do you believe that is a suitable reason for their actions? Ifso, you believe that universal moral values do not exist. That each country and/or groupof people have separate rights and wrongs associated with their culture. On the otherhand if you feel that the Axis Powers were correct in putting these officers on trial, thenyou believe that there are basic mor al values, that should be obeyed. The term for this isEqual Dignity. Therefore you believe in a Universal Justice also known as Cicero NaturalLaw Doctrine. The second question that is discussed, when speaking of ethics, is What principlesshould guide my actions or choices? In other words, what do I base my decisions on? Most people judge their behavior by what is good, fair or just. Others by what will bringthem pleasure. These people believe in hedonism. There are individuals that determinetheir actions by fear, self-preservation or instinct. Furthermore another question is, whatmakes a society a just one? There are two sides to this question. A major issue concernedwith this argument is the imprisonment of convicted criminals. On one hand, some peoplebelieve in retributive justice. They understand that one should repay their debt to society,if necessary. They believe in rehabilitation. On the other hand, those who believe indistributive justice are under the concept, that equal we alth is the answer to making asociety just. These people believe that everyone should be treated the same. Finally, the last question dealing with ethics is, what is the relationship betweenlaws and morality? Laws are the rules established by an authority. Many people think thatlaws should be written with the pure intent of creating and therefore, keeping a society inorder. Others feel that laws should be written with moral rights in mind. For instance thetopic of abortion. Although the law was passed that it is legal for a woman to get anabortion, many believe the law in morally wrong. These people believe that, a child is alife from conception and should have the right to live. Whether they are correct or not, isthe law a moral one? Then, the question should be asked who decides what is moral andwhat isnt?Metaphysics is the third area of philosophy. It is the study of the way the worldreally is. Once again there are questions about this topic. An important question is, whatis the ultimate nature of reality? The first answer is that nature is purely physical ormaterial. Therefore everything is simply made of matter and nothing more. An exampleof this, is the brain, simply a part of our body. There is no soul present. Another answeris that nature is spiritual, being non-material. It means that we will experience reality iscompletely spiritual terms, with our soul, an example is the mind. The mind is anintellectual faculty that is in charge of our understanding, memories and opinions. Dualism is the combination of both materialism and spiritualism. It suggests nature ismade up of physical and spiritual elements. Accordingly, it also suggests that the brainand mind act as a team. Another question concerned with metaphysics is, does theuniverse have rational or moral order? Or is it simply absurd? If our universe was absurd,then there would be no goals to set, no purpose in your life. Basically, if it was true ourexistence would just be a bad joke. God is also a topic up for discussion when related to metaphysics. The questionarises of whether or not God created the world. Many cultures have a vast number ofanswers to this question, most deal with religion. The Roman Catholic and Jewishreligions+ believe a single male God created the world in seven days. Ancient Greeks andRomans believed that several female goddesses and male gods created the universe. Withthis question, the meaning of life is also pondered. Cosmology is the study of theuniverse. Various philosophers contemplate the ultimate nature of reality and the originsof the universe. .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .postImageUrl , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:hover , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:visited , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:active { border:0!important; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:active , .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425 .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u32c79d3b7eec6ea08dcb3bddc7cc0425:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Reconstruction EssayThe three fundamental questions in the field of philosophy, will never be answeredfully. If they were, the world would be neglected of great thinkers, philosophers, such asPlato, Socrates and Amaxander.